Safa Marwah
Two significant high-severity security vulnerabilities discovered within Chainlit, a widely adopted open-source framework pivotal for developing sophisticated conversational artificial intelligence applications, have been found to facilitate unauthorized access to server files and the exfiltration of sensitive information. These critical flaws, collectively termed ‘ChainLeak’ by the cybersecurity researchers at Zafran Labs, present a formidable threat to internet-facing AI systems currently operational across diverse sectors, including prominent enterprise organizations. The exploitation of these vulnerabilities can occur without any direct user interaction, underscoring the severe and immediate risk they pose to deployed AI infrastructure.
Chainlit stands as a cornerstone in the rapidly evolving landscape of AI application development, boasting an impressive adoption rate with hundreds of thousands of monthly downloads from the PyPI registry, culminating in millions of annual downloads. Its popularity stems from its comprehensive toolkit, which offers a ready-to-use web user interface specifically designed for chat-based AI components, robust backend integration tools, and inherent support for essential functionalities such as authentication, session management, and streamlined cloud deployment. This framework is frequently leveraged in demanding production environments within enterprise settings and academic institutions, where it underpins critical AI-driven operations and research initiatives. Its pervasive deployment in internet-facing systems amplifies the potential impact of any security weakness, making the recent findings particularly alarming for the broader AI community and organizations relying on such technologies.
The ‘ChainLeak’ findings encompass two distinct but potentially combinable security issues: an arbitrary file read vulnerability identified as CVE-2026-22218, and a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability designated as CVE-2026-22219. Both vulnerabilities, when exploited, offer attackers significant inroads into compromised systems, with the potential for escalating privileges and extensive data exfiltration.
CVE-2026-22218, the arbitrary file read vulnerability, centers on the /project/element endpoint within the Chainlit framework. Attackers can exploit this flaw by submitting a crafted custom element containing a manipulated path field. This malicious input coerces the Chainlit server into copying the file located at the specified path into the attacker’s active session, critically bypassing validation mechanisms. The implications of such an exploit are profound, granting unauthorized individuals the ability to read virtually any file accessible to the Chainlit server. This includes highly sensitive data such as API keys, cloud account credentials, proprietary source code, internal configuration files, SQLite databases containing potentially critical information, and various authentication secrets. The exposure of these assets can directly lead to unauthorized access to other linked systems, data repositories, and cloud services, initiating a cascade of security incidents.
The second vulnerability, CVE-2026-22219, pertains to server-side request forgery and specifically impacts Chainlit deployments that utilize the SQLAlchemy data layer. This vulnerability is triggered when an attacker sets the url field of a custom element to a malicious external or internal address. The server is then compelled to initiate an outbound GET request to the specified URL, subsequently storing the fetched response. Attackers can then retrieve this fetched data via standard element download endpoints. This capability allows malicious actors to probe internal network infrastructure, identify and interact with internal REST services, and map internal IP addresses and services that would otherwise be inaccessible from the external network. The ability to perform SSRF attacks is a critical precursor to lateral movement within a compromised network, enabling attackers to discover and exploit additional internal resources.
The synergy between these two vulnerabilities is particularly concerning. Zafran Labs researchers meticulously demonstrated that CVE-2026-22218 and CVE-2026-22219 are not merely standalone threats but can be integrated into a sophisticated attack chain. This combined approach facilitates a full-system compromise and enables lateral movement across interconnected cloud environments. An attacker could first use the arbitrary file read to exfiltrate cloud credentials or internal network configuration, then leverage the SSRF vulnerability to pivot into internal services identified through the initial reconnaissance, ultimately achieving comprehensive control over the affected infrastructure. This highlights the critical need for robust security measures that consider the potential for multi-stage attacks.
The discovery and subsequent disclosure process for these vulnerabilities followed a responsible timeline. Zafran Labs initiated contact with the Chainlit maintainers on November 23, 2025, providing detailed information about the identified flaws. Acknowledgment of the vulnerabilities was received on December 9, 2025, demonstrating an active engagement from the framework’s development team. Critical fixes addressing both vulnerabilities were subsequently released on December 24, 2025, with the availability of Chainlit version 2.9.4. This swift resolution underscores the severity of the issues and the responsiveness of the open-source community in addressing security concerns.
Given the high severity and profound exploitation potential of CVE-2026-22218 and CVE-2026-22219, it is imperative for all organizations utilizing Chainlit in their AI application deployments to take immediate action. The primary recommendation is to upgrade to version 2.9.4 or any subsequent patched release as quickly as possible. As of the latest updates, Chainlit version 2.9.6 is available and incorporates these crucial security fixes. Delay in applying these updates significantly prolongs the window of exposure, leaving critical AI systems and underlying cloud infrastructure vulnerable to sophisticated attacks.
Beyond immediate patching, these vulnerabilities serve as a stark reminder of the broader challenges in securing AI-driven systems. Organizations must adopt a comprehensive security posture that extends beyond routine updates. This includes implementing principles of least privilege, ensuring that Chainlit applications and their underlying services operate with only the minimum necessary permissions. Network segmentation is crucial to limit the blast radius of any potential compromise, isolating AI application environments from sensitive corporate networks and data stores. Robust input validation mechanisms must be implemented at all layers to prevent the injection of malicious data that could exploit similar vulnerabilities in the future. Regular security audits, penetration testing, and code reviews of AI frameworks and custom code are essential practices to proactively identify and mitigate emerging threats. Furthermore, the security of the software supply chain, from open-source dependencies to deployment pipelines, warrants meticulous scrutiny to prevent the introduction of vulnerabilities at any stage. Proactive monitoring for suspicious activity, including unusual file access patterns or outbound network connections from AI application servers, can provide early warning signs of attempted exploitation.
The emergence of critical vulnerabilities in widely used AI frameworks like Chainlit underscores a growing trend in cybersecurity: the expanding attack surface presented by artificial intelligence technologies. As AI adoption accelerates across industries, the security of the underlying frameworks and platforms becomes paramount. These incidents highlight the unique security considerations associated with AI systems, which often process sensitive data, interact with complex backend services, and operate in dynamic cloud environments. The lessons learned from ‘ChainLeak’ will undoubtedly influence future best practices for AI security, emphasizing the need for security-by-design principles throughout the AI development lifecycle. Organizations must recognize that the rapid innovation in AI must be meticulously balanced with an equally robust commitment to cybersecurity, ensuring that the transformative potential of AI is realized without compromising foundational security principles. The ongoing scrutiny of open-source AI frameworks by security researchers is invaluable in identifying and mitigating these risks, fostering a more secure and resilient AI ecosystem for all.
Aura Kasih
Ridwan Kamil
Lisa Mariana