Aura Kasih
Recent data indicates a significant shift in the social media landscape, with Meta’s Threads application now reportedly surpassing Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter) in terms of daily active users on mobile devices globally. This development marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing competition between the two platforms, though X continues to maintain a commanding lead in web-based traffic and overall user engagement. The implications of this mobile-centric victory for Threads, and the broader trends it may represent, warrant a comprehensive examination of user behavior, platform strategies, and the evolving nature of digital interaction.
The analytics, compiled by Similarweb and shared by industry publication TechCrunch, reveal that as of January 7th, Threads boasted approximately 141.5 million daily active users across its iOS and Android mobile applications worldwide. In contrast, X registered 125 million daily active users on its mobile platforms during the same period. This marks a notable achievement for Threads, which launched less than three years ago with the explicit aim of challenging X’s dominance in real-time news and public discourse.
Crucially, this crossover in mobile daily active users did not occur in a vacuum or as a direct consequence of recent controversies surrounding X’s AI chatbot, Grok. Similarweb’s analysis suggests that Threads began to consistently gain ground on X in late October and early November of the previous year, indicating a sustained period of organic growth and user adoption. This gradual ascent points to a deeper underlying trend of user preference or platform appeal rather than a sudden, reactive shift.
While Threads has demonstrated impressive traction in the mobile sphere, the competitive dynamic remains nuanced. Within the United States, X continues to hold a lead in daily mobile users. However, even in this key market, Threads is demonstrably closing the gap. Furthermore, X has experienced a substantial decline in its US daily active mobile user base, reportedly halving its numbers compared to the previous year. This suggests a potential erosion of X’s established user loyalty or a diminished appeal to a segment of its American audience, creating an opening for Threads.
The divergence in user engagement between mobile and web platforms highlights a critical distinction in how users are interacting with these services. While Threads may be winning the battle for mobile attention, X remains the undisputed leader in web traffic. As of January 13th, X attracted a staggering 145.4 million daily web visitors. Threads, by comparison, garnered a mere 8.5 million daily web visitors. This disparity underscores that while Threads might be more accessible and appealing for on-the-go consumption, X retains a significant stronghold for users accessing the platforms via desktop or laptop computers.
The aggregate user numbers further illustrate the scale of the challenge ahead for Meta. Even with the combined daily active user figures for Threads and X hovering around 150 million for the former and over 270 million for the latter, X maintains a substantial overall advantage in sheer user numbers across all platforms. This suggests that while Threads is making inroads, it has a considerable distance to cover to rival X’s established global footprint.
The implications of Threads’ mobile ascendancy are multifaceted. For Meta, it represents a significant validation of its strategy to create a text-based conversational platform as a direct competitor to X. The company has invested heavily in Threads, leveraging its vast existing user base from Instagram to bootstrap initial growth. The continued expansion on mobile suggests that Threads is successfully attracting and retaining users who prefer the convenience and ubiquitously of smartphone-based social media. This demographic often prioritizes immediate access to information, quick updates, and social connection, areas where mobile applications excel.
For X, this shift in mobile engagement is a potential warning sign. The platform, which has undergone significant transformation and strategic pivots since its acquisition by Elon Musk, appears to be losing its grip on a crucial segment of its user base. While the platform’s identity has evolved to encompass a broader range of content and functionalities, including its AI initiatives, the decline in mobile users could indicate that these changes are not resonating with all segments of its audience, or perhaps are even alienating some. The continued strength in web traffic suggests that dedicated users and those seeking a more in-depth or news-focused experience may still favor X, but the erosion of its mobile user base could impact its overall reach and advertising potential in the long term.
Several factors could be contributing to Threads’ mobile growth. The platform’s integration with Instagram, allowing for seamless account creation and follower migration, provided an immediate advantage. Furthermore, Meta has likely focused on optimizing the Threads mobile experience for speed, ease of use, and engagement. The platform’s more curated and less chaotic environment, compared to the often-contentious nature of X, might also appeal to a broader audience seeking a less polarizing social media experience. Threads’ focus on conversational threads and a more visually appealing interface could also be drawing users who find X’s traditional timeline format less engaging.
Conversely, X’s challenges on mobile could stem from a variety of factors. The platform’s ongoing changes to its content moderation policies, its approach to verified accounts, and the introduction of new features like Grok may have created friction for some users. The perceived instability or unpredictability of the platform’s direction under new leadership could also be contributing to user attrition. Moreover, the increasing prevalence of misinformation and inflammatory content on X, particularly on mobile where rapid consumption is common, might be driving users to seek alternative platforms.
The contrasting performance between mobile and web engagement also points to distinct user behaviors and platform strengths. The mobile environment is inherently suited for quick consumption, real-time updates, and social interactions that are often characterized by brevity and immediacy. Threads’ success here suggests it is effectively catering to these demands. The web, on the other hand, can accommodate more in-depth exploration, longer-form content, and a more deliberate engagement with information. X’s continued dominance in this arena indicates it still serves as a primary destination for users who value its archival capabilities, its role as a news aggregator, and its capacity for more extended discussions.
Looking ahead, both platforms face distinct strategic imperatives. For Meta, the immediate goal will be to consolidate its mobile gains and work towards closing the gap in overall user numbers and web engagement. This will likely involve continued feature development, content diversification, and further integration with its existing social media ecosystem. The challenge will be to maintain user interest and prevent attrition as the novelty of the platform wears off and as X inevitably adapts to this new competitive pressure. Meta will also need to demonstrate a clear path to monetization for Threads that doesn’t compromise the user experience.
For X, the priority will be to reverse the trend of mobile user decline and solidify its position as a comprehensive platform for information and discourse. This may involve re-evaluating its current strategic direction, addressing user concerns regarding content moderation and platform stability, and potentially refocusing on core functionalities that have historically driven its popularity. The company may also need to invest in improving its mobile application’s performance and user interface to better compete with Threads’ accessibility. Furthermore, X’s ability to leverage its established user base for innovative features, such as its AI integration, will be crucial in re-engaging its audience.
The evolving dynamics between Threads and X also reflect broader trends in the social media industry. The increasing reliance on mobile devices for daily communication and information access underscores the importance of a robust and engaging mobile experience. Platforms that can effectively cater to the nuances of mobile interaction are likely to see sustained growth. Furthermore, the competition between these two giants highlights the ongoing search for the optimal balance between real-time information dissemination, community building, and user safety. As both platforms continue to evolve, their respective successes and failures will offer valuable insights into the future trajectory of social media and digital public squares. The battle for user attention is far from over, and the next chapter in this rivalry promises to be a compelling study in platform evolution and user preference.
Ridwan Kamil
Safa Marwah
Lisa Mariana
Ayu Aulia